A45
Guide7 min read

Standard values vs. measured data: When can you use BR18's table values?

BR18 requires measured data for energy but allows choice for transport. Standard values are up to 70x higher than actual data. See when measurement is mandatory, when you can choose, and the recommended strategy.

A45 Teamet|Published April 2, 2026

When must you measure — and when can you choose?

BR18 does not give you free choice for all items. Some data must be measured, others must use a fixed standard value, and a third category gives you freedom to choose. Here are the rules:

Data pointMethodRationale
Electricity, heating, fuel for machines > 1 tonneMandatory measured dataThe building owner's actual consumption must be documented.
Terminal handlingMandatory standard valueFixed 0.02 kg CO₂e/m²/year — cannot be changed.
Material transport (A4)OptionalStandard values (Table 10), measured data, or EPD.
Waste and soil transportOptionalStandard value (0.06 kg CO₂e/m²/year) or measured data.
Construction waste (fractions)OptionalTable 11 factors with actual weight, or EPD data.

The key point: you can freely mix methods within the same project. You can use measured data for concrete transport and standard values for insulation materials — there is no requirement for consistency across materials. For the full overview of requirements, see our BR18 A4-A5 guide.

The hidden penalty of standard values

The standard values in BR18 are deliberately conservative. They are set high as a precautionary principle — and as an incentive to collect actual data. When you use Table 10 for transport calculation, you must add two surcharges:

  • +0.02 kg CO₂e/m²/year for terminal handling (this surcharge is fixed and always applies).
  • +0.02 kg CO₂e/m²/year for spillage and packaging when using standard values.

The total surcharge is therefore +0.04 kg CO₂e/m²/year when you choose standard values for transport. It doesn't sound like much, but it is added on top of every single material, and it adds up.

Standard values generally yield a higher result than actual data, simply because they are designed as worst-case. That is the price of convenience.

Example: Plasterboard with three methods

Let's look at a concrete example: transport of plasterboard over 200 km to a building with a reference area of 300 m².

MethodCalculationResult
Standard value (Table 10)Table value for truck 200 km + terminal surcharge 0.02 + spillage/packaging 0.02~0.041 kg CO₂e/m²/year
Measured dataActual fuel consumption per delivery, actual weight, actual distance~0.00057 kg CO₂e/m²/year
EPD dataManufacturer's environmental product declaration with A4 moduleVaries — typically between standard value and measured data

In this example, the standard value is approximately 70 times higher than the measured data. This is not an error — standard values are dimensioned to cover the worst-case scenario. If you use them for all materials, you will quickly fill the budget.

EPD data: Opportunities and pitfalls

Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) according to EN 15804 can be used as an alternative data source for A4. They provide product-specific emission data, often lower than standard values but higher than actual measured data.

The pitfalls of EPDs:

  • Validity: An EPD is valid for 5 years. Use an expired EPD and your calculation may be rejected during spot checks.
  • Unit conversion: EPDs state data per declared unit (e.g., per m², per kg, per piece). Conversion errors between the EPD unit and your actual quantity are a frequent source of mistakes.
  • Distance assumptions: The EPD's A4 module is typically based on an assumed transport distance. If your actual distance is shorter, measured data may yield a lower result.
  • Coverage: Not all products have an EPD. In practice, you have EPDs for standard products (concrete, steel, insulation) but rarely for specialty products.

The most effective approach is a pragmatic mix of methods. Here is a recommendation based on the best balance between effort and result:

ItemRecommended methodRationale
Concrete, steel, large material volumesMeasured dataLarge CO₂ item — actual data typically yields significantly lower results.
Energy consumption (electricity, heating, diesel)Measured data (mandatory)Required by BR18. Read meters continuously.
Smaller materials, specialty productsStandard values / EPDLow CO₂ share — the effort of measuring does not outweigh the savings.
Waste fractionsWeigh slips + Table 11Weigh slips from receiving facilities provide actual weight per fraction.
Waste/soil haulingStandard value (0.06 + 0.06)Standard value typically covers the need — the savings from measured data rarely justify the effort for this item.

The key is to focus your data collection effort where it has the greatest impact. A45 lets you compare all three methods per emission and automatically select the lowest — and still correct — result. See also our comparison of A45, LCAbyg, and Excel.

Frequently asked questions

Energy consumption (electricity, heating, fuel for machines over 1 tonne) is mandatory measured data. You cannot replace it with standard values.

Terminal handling has a fixed standard value of 0.02 kg CO₂e/m²/year in BR18. It always applies and cannot be changed, regardless of whether you use measured data or standard values for the rest of the transport.

Yes. You can freely use measured data for some materials and standard values for others. There is no requirement for consistency across materials in the same project.

It varies, but for transport, standard values can be up to 70 times higher than actual data. For most materials, the difference is a factor of 2-10.

An EPD according to EN 15804 is valid for 5 years from the publication date. Use of an expired EPD may result in rejection during the municipality's spot check.

Measure the big items (concrete, steel, energy consumption), use standard values for the small ones. Always compare methods to find the lowest — and still correct — result. You can choose the best method per material.

Ready to automate your BR18 documentation?

See how A45 can save you hours on every construction project with AI-powered invoice scanning and automatic climate calculations.

Related articles

Guide2. april 2026

BR18 A4-A5: The Complete Guide to Climate Requirements for the Construction Process

Everything you need to know about A4-A5 requirements in BR18 — limits, documentation, calculation methods, responsibility distribution, and practical workflow from planning to occupancy permit.

A45 Teamet|15 min read
Guide2. april 2026

Practical guide to data collection on the construction site

Everything you need to collect for the A4-A5 calculation — from delivery notes and fuel receipts to weighing slips and electricity meter data. With checklist and subcontractor handling.

A45 Teamet|10 min read
Guide2. april 2026

The 1-ton rule and de minimis thresholds in BR18 A4-A5

BR18 §297 exempts machines under 1 ton, water consumption, and consumables from the A4-A5 calculation. Here is the complete overview of exemptions and fixed rates.

A45 Teamet|5 min read
Guide2. april 2026

Hidden CO₂ traps on the construction site

Construction waste accounts for 38% of the A4+A5 budget — and mixed waste is penalized harshly. Overview of BR18 Table 11's 15 fractions, energy traps from drying and site huts, and concrete reduction strategies.

A45 Teamet|8 min read
Comparison2. april 2026

A45 vs. LCAbyg vs. Excel: Comparison of A4-A5 tools

Objective comparison of the three realistic approaches to A4-A5 documentation: LCAbyg (free, full LCA), Excel (flexible, risky), and A45 (AI-driven, purpose-built). With comparison table.

A45 Teamet|8 min read
Comparison6. april 2026

Invoice-based vs. sensor-based A4-A5 documentation

Comparison of two methods for A4-A5 data collection: invoice-based (no hardware, low cost, full BR18 coverage) vs. sensor-based (real-time data, high cost, partial coverage). BR18 does not require real-time measurement.

A45 Teamet|9 min read